Who is more dangerous, males or psychopaths?
Take a non-gendered, non sociopathic person. Are they more likely to be a murderer if we make them male or if we make them a psychopath? The answer is male.
Male non-psychopathic murderers
Total in the U.S. in 2013 = 5058 male murderers
At one person's estimate, psychopaths are an estimated 25% of murderers: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/201812/are-murderers-unfairly-labeled-psychopaths
5058*.75 = 3793.5 male American non-psychopath murderers.
Controlled for population size:
Total male U.S. population = 151.8 million
3793.5 male non-psychopath murderers /151.8M male americans =
0.002499011% likelihood you're a murderer if you're an American male non-psychopath
Non-male psychopath murderers
For non-male psychopath murders, let's first take the number of non-male murderers: 665
665 non-male murders again at the rate of 25% of murderers are psychopaths =
665*.25 = 166 non-male American psychopath murderers
Controlled for population size.
Total non male psychopath population in the U.S. is 176.M. Approximately four percent of those are psychopaths.
176.4M*4% = 7,056,000 non-male American psychopaths.
166 non-male psychopath American murderers /7.056M non-male American psychopaths =
0.002352607% likelihood you're a murderer if you're a non-male American psychopath
***Being male makes you more likely to be a murderer than being a psychopath.****
Both are still highly unlikely, e.g. if you come across a random male or random non-male psychopath it's still very unlikely they are a murderer.
Of course these numbers are just rough estimates, but I think this quick back of the envelope calculation suggests at the very least that common intuitions regarding the dangerousness of psychopaths need to be re-examined and further research is warranted.