tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post2123160089093129183..comments2024-03-28T00:33:57.308-07:00Comments on Sociopath World: Seventeen face of psychopathUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger64125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-20289060139391930762020-11-17T05:51:48.746-08:002020-11-17T05:51:48.746-08:00The creative artist is vastly underrepresented wit...The creative artist is vastly underrepresented within the sociopath community.I hear countless stories of CEOs or lawyers yet not many on the "creative artist". The art realm is a place were introversion or chaos is welcomed. The sociopath may get a glimpse of what a world without shackles of mediocrity may be like. It is a world of all that is taboo with no boundaries per say. I myself have gravitated to this field due to the genuine freedom of expression. Whether it be school or work their is a constant set of boundaries one must follow. I have found this is not so within artist communities. I have found my art work to be genuine representation of the emptiness and chaos that floods my mind. It is a release. Anger more often than not is portrayed through my images whether it be images of death or horror it is a place you can openly express your thoughts without being judged as sadistic. It is through my outside the box imagery that I am able to stand out in a positive fashion. Each picture is a story. It is a clue to my mind. The cracks of my disorder shine through my pictures. Like a spider weeving his web for prey .. The images leave my followers ever so curious with what is actually going on in my mind. Like a moth attracted to light. I am curious to hear other sociopaths perspectives on the arts? I believe their is a creative aspect to sociopathy that has not been mentioned much. I see the mediocrity of "artists" following one after another with their trends. It is tasteless. The essence of art is originality or something "unique". What better person to contribute a unique perspective than the person that feels nothing yet everything at the same time?Annon.https://www.blogger.com/profile/15501637574469357085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-77048805837387646932015-08-24T17:33:39.295-07:002015-08-24T17:33:39.295-07:00I have read your book and can relate about myself ...I have read your book and can relate about myself with sociopath tendencies. However, I'm stuck on if I am or more Machiavellian. I tend to have the following outlook.<br />1 I have emotions for animals and would kill someone who is cruel to them. <br />2 I hate terrorists and want the worse for them. <br /> 3 I hate authority and often plan to ruin them or their reputations. <br />4 I am defiant with my bosses. <br />5 I read people and if your against me, I will plant seeds and seek to ruin you. If your a nice person and I like you, I'm a good friend. However, my friends are similar to me. <br /> 6 A family member is playing games with me the example, I keep fit and they want me to be fat as they are. They go out of their way to go one better or belittle what I do. I'm slowly planting the seed to ruin them. <br /> 7 I want power to ruin those who have tried to ruin me. <br />8 I adapt to my surroundings and play nice when I meet new people, some I like and others I'm not interested. I hid my true nature and often play little boy lost. <br />9 I'm dyslexic and often see things other don't and read body language and emotions. <br /> 10 There is a battle between being the emperor from Star Wars or Han Solo and My good side tries to fend off the dark side. Personally I want to dominate and ruin those who I know are threatsKelvinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06131388742419256398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-53697052605924728722015-08-24T17:31:02.818-07:002015-08-24T17:31:02.818-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Kelvinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06131388742419256398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-52536040657464095282014-04-16T20:45:11.142-07:002014-04-16T20:45:11.142-07:00Not every sociopath is the same. You can be empath...Not every sociopath is the same. You can be empathetic or not it all depends on the individual some do feel empathetic towards family and friends. Others feel no empathy at all. Psychopaths have different brain structures which is why they are they way they are at times a sociopaths brains looks different but most of the time it does not. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-64719954711993227732014-03-21T11:28:45.899-07:002014-03-21T11:28:45.899-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
I'm gonna take th...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />I'm gonna take that as a compliment.<br />& I sincerely find your perspective on life respectable. I believe you do appreciate your existence & maybe that's where we both differ. Maybe me being a sociopath means I feel the need to take control of my future; to gravely need to find a valuable use for myself; that I can't even appreciate properly my own existence due to my lack of feeling; I can't seem to reach satiation. And to set up myself such a difficult task would mean I'm most likely to not complete it in my lifetime alone, so i won't feel the need to aim for something bigger that might in the end turn morbid. I'm trying to make the best of my worst trait: eternal inconformity. I'm a logical machine; achievement is my power source; and it worries me. It makes my reasoning endless, my goals or purposes exponentially expansive & my methods incredibly detailed. And trying to develop emotion might help me identify when to stop; by trying to fix the problem that keeps me from feeling I've done enough; that's my current intention. And in case I fail, I still would've put my abilities to good use even if it proves pointless, because I wouldn't have become destructive but instead constructive, by starting with myself. I'm my own experiment. A psychologist might conclude with the fact that I am helplessly ill; but I think I can fix my lack of emotion issue, the same way I turned my innate introversion into extraversion, by power of will encouraged by logic (I figured it was better for communicating ideas when I was about 12). I don't deny the fact I am imbalanced, for my logical side is by far more developed than my emotional one, but that doesn't mean I will stay like that forever. That's why I don't believe in tests or static personality types (with what we started this argumentation), I do believe in 'voluntary evolution' more like 'self-upgrading' or voluntary development; because it's only a matter of will to become balanced. & Lastly I want to thank you, because I have learned something from you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-6009946494899352732014-03-20T22:27:57.234-07:002014-03-20T22:27:57.234-07:00Hmm. #2, 3, 4 and 10 all resonate with me. I fit t...Hmm. #2, 3, 4 and 10 all resonate with me. I fit the hypersexual subtype, without pedophilia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-40715600483322505382014-03-20T21:35:56.735-07:002014-03-20T21:35:56.735-07:00Let me be the first to congratulate you on all of ...Let me be the first to congratulate you on all of your future success. You certainly seem to have two of the triad covered. ;)<br /><br />Look, I too have my own narcissistic tendencies, and even though I feel like the world revolves around me, rationally I know that it doesn't. There is certainly some tension between the belief that I matter and the knowledge that I don't. What you see as meaninglessness, I find incredibly liberating. I don't think my life is trivial, but it only matters because it is fleeting and finite. If one truly believes (as most religions do) in an afterlife, what significance does this bundle of years hold against eternity? The prospect of utter annihilation makes my own existence incredibly special, because it is the only opportunity I have to experience anything. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14837238029620913050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-59415903683575049882014-03-20T17:51:19.093-07:002014-03-20T17:51:19.093-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
It goes against all o...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />It goes against all odds for socios to have such an important purpose doesn't it? what's gonna stop us from believing so if not ourselves. We are masterminds, we play with society, we make believe, we learn through other's, we train ourselves & the whole world is our playground. Why not play to be a hero? Sociopaths have the ease to become whatever they want to be, aren't they the greatest con-men ever? Truth is, you are absolutely right, I'm being pretentious, because I'm a sociopath. I refuse to underachieve with abilities such as mine; I refuse to give up on my goal if I have the ease to really become whatever I want to; I refuse to destroy the very world & society from which I resulted; I am not gonna kill my 'creators' as my 'disorder' supposes I would, I'm gonna help them. And if I fail & my thoughts make me pretentious, then I will die as such. I will not conform to a future of being labeled a mistake, an imbalance, an error, a disorder, that somebody else made us to be. Just because it's written down and approved by many and most doesn't make it a strict rule. They say sociopaths are unable of empathy yet i understand where you're coming from; people really believe we're incapable of feeling because we're too smart to find a use for it, but i have. Feeling helps you understand others, to grow emotionally, to be on the same 'brainwave' as another; or maybe I've just made myself believe that I can feel. Anyway, I think that believing I do is enough, otherwise i would perceive my existence as trivial as you do yours. And I have plans, to achieve my aspirations. I promise you will hear of me someday. You may try to convince me otherwise, that I actually am sick or confused, as will most psychologists, but if I'm not behaving destructively, why am I wrong? evil? Why am I sick? It is sick when it's illogical, like suicide; you feel fear, anxiety and stress to make you react to a possible threat. So what is depression if not a constant sign of a threat? Look at teenagers nowadays, they don't believe they can achieve anything; I do. Most people are stressed too and they don't change anything. Most people are socially anxious when we're supposed to be a social species. Most people are fearful of experiencing new things because they have been traumatized so badly to be afraid of living. So, what are they here for? Try all you want, tell me all you can, prove me a million times wrong; I am past the point of doubting myself, for i was one of hundreds of sperms that succeeded once, so why not one of millions of humans?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-39292812303633425122014-03-20T17:50:37.965-07:002014-03-20T17:50:37.965-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
Nature doesn't ma...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />Nature doesn't make mistakes, it experiments. Why wouldn't we be one? <br /><br />& You know, your last remark "We are just animals that happen to have the right mix of chemicals and hormones sloshing around in our skulls to make us feel smart and purposeful and important" makes me realize that you lack a purpose, that you don't feel smart nor important; & you blame nature. <br />So we just exist for the sake of existing? And even if we did, why wouldn't we at least pretend to have something useful to do? Something important? Sociopaths are great at lying to themselves, i'll give you that, but, how come that with your judgment (sociopathic i believe) you are still here? isn't it logical to be suicidal? You are here because you're still looking for answers to this question that has been implanted deep within you but you deny to let it win; that's why i respect you. <br />Does being a sociopath mean you are born without a purpose? and therefore desperately seek to find one throughout your existence? that you are 'condemned for eternity' to lie to yourself and never achieve something great because you're psychologically imbalanced? The media has lied to everyone. 'Sicknesses' like these aren't genetic, they're defense mechanisms, and sociopaths happen to not give into society's 'self-destructive modus operandi', they are the only real humans left along with empaths & psychopaths (& maybe other 'imbalanced' tendencies), even though they're incomplete (ASPDs lack empathy; empaths lack a little abstraction).<br />& This notion of yours "Nature is uncaring and unfeeling and blind", well, 'it' gave you your judgment that lead you to your last conclusion (the one I mentioned first), so maybe that's why you find it uncaring; you have all this talent, and for what? in the end you're not really smart, you're not really purposeful & you're not really important, so why pretend to believe so? & if you convinced yourself otherwise, nobody would believe you anyway. Look at me now.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-84137518095443065512014-03-20T15:23:33.563-07:002014-03-20T15:23:33.563-07:00You percieve it as a rare gift. But it is a person...You percieve it as a rare gift. But it is a personality disorder. You should meet the other million socios (or Jesuses). It will make you grow or fight.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-68668226222515180162014-03-20T15:09:52.998-07:002014-03-20T15:09:52.998-07:00"make us feel"
How insightfull."make us feel"<br />How insightfull.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-23375354215881606742014-03-20T13:33:55.329-07:002014-03-20T13:33:55.329-07:00I think it is the wordiness of your posts combined...I think it is the wordiness of your posts combined with the half-formed big ideas. If you are really 17, this is excusable as you still have a lot to learn. I was probably pretentious at that age, too.<br /><br />If these topics interest you, you will certainly have ample opportunity to explore them in college. You seem smart. But I think you are searching for some kind of higher purpose or meaning in your sociopathy that doesn't exist. If you are a sociopath, there isn't some teleological reason why. It's part of the natural variation in people; some people are tall and some are short, some people are pretty and some are ugly, some people are empaths and some people are sociopaths. We might be able to theorize about what environmental factors led to the emergence of these traits, but if you are thinking about it in terms of "natural goals" or "reasons" or "purpose" you are already on the wrong track. Nature is uncaring and unfeeling and blind. <br /><br />We are just animals that happen to have the right mix of chemicals and hormones sloshing around in our skulls to make us feel smart and purposeful and important.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14837238029620913050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-80460947306192503692014-03-20T09:15:29.986-07:002014-03-20T09:15:29.986-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
Why would you find me...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />Why would you find me annoying? it seems i'm being fair enough to explain the basis of my judgement. And I am not threatening, I'm a socio.<br />& I agree with you anyway, what seems to be the problem?<br /> But Everything happens for a reason; intellectual development the one for sociopaths. Let me explain why I identify this ('self upgrading') as the issue. I find it to be the logical somewhat natural goal & reason of existence of a sociopath. (Yes, i have constantly wondered about the real reason behind my 'condition'... ever since i was 7) Here i explained along with examples of distinguished people with sociopathic tendencies.<br /><br />"...I believe that if we eradicate society's evolutionary defense mechanism, we might as well have a nuclear war and come to an end with our fate. <br />ASPD- we figure there's a problem with the individual, but never consider it might be a response to a problem with society.<br />Sociopaths (extroverts) & psychopaths (more of introverts) are conscious human beings that recognize a problem external to them at a very young age. They are logical in their thinking so act defensively to this outer threat, retreating, confronting, attacking the 'problem' (society). They are an individual defense mechanism, like the cells in our bodies. They adapt & learn from adverse experiences & become what we know them to be. Some may lack the guidance to realize their essential role in society's psychological health and become somewhat selfish, like Machiavelli, Hitler & Napoleon, that turn outwardly destructive or factiously motivated; while others more altruistic such as Kant, Marx & Gandhi, that turn socially influential & collectively motivated. They are both as capable of such things, it's only a matter of orientation."<br /><br />I hope someone explains if i am to be mistaken. <br />If someone believes i am, please express yourself scientifically & methodically (for there is nothing more tiresome for a socio than an undeveloped opinion) Not with facts, studies or charts, since i doubt everything, but pure reason and logic. <br /><br />I'd like to meet your thought process and if it proves to be valid i'll accept my mistake & thank you.<br />Oh, & Hieronymous Bot, if you still seem to have a problem with me 'being annoying' after agreeing with your opinion in the first place & explaining all that i have, I will logically assume you first commented to seem clever, imposing & nothing more. I would see what you did there though socio, you were looking for a fault. Wouldn't make me respect you any less anyway, but that's not the way to solve 'problems' (with an opposing argument) but rather a broader explanation for your judgement. <br />I apologize if i seemed to be against you at some point, i never have been, nor am. I completely agree with you, but i beg you to understand what I'm getting at. I respect you because you have a fairly reasonable logic judging by every comment of yours.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-87716745064619023362014-03-20T00:37:52.085-07:002014-03-20T00:37:52.085-07:00Outing would be nice.Outing would be nice.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-61022976934283539262014-03-19T18:55:45.606-07:002014-03-19T18:55:45.606-07:00basically it gives you back your power knowing wha...basically it gives you back your power knowing what your dealing with,then you have lots of choices and your not in their grasp anymore.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-7114166114894466032014-03-19T14:43:19.896-07:002014-03-19T14:43:19.896-07:00Dude, you've been annoying for a while. Don...Dude, you've been annoying for a while. Don't worry about it. More interesting is why those issues- war, destruction, extinction bother you so much. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14837238029620913050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-3530869814331564722014-03-19T14:10:04.857-07:002014-03-19T14:10:04.857-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
Because a species as ...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />Because a species as capable as ours shouldn't have wars nor be narrow minded, superficial, biased, judgmental, gullible, conforming, shallow, destructive, uninterested, hostile... <br />when we have amazing analytical, associative, summarizing, planning, decoding, judging abilities; that if properly used, wouldn't cause the outcome we live in today, but result in the thrive of our coexistence without major troubles. How could the brightest brain & creature at the top of the food chain recur to self-destruction? Where's the intelligence in that, if it goes against our very innate need of survival? It's illogical < The worst insult we could ever get from a thinking specimen. <br />We're provoking our own extinction by not thinking. <br />& I'M GONNA STOP NOW because I'm starting to feel annoying ;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-87047245709640355812014-03-19T13:43:18.107-07:002014-03-19T13:43:18.107-07:00Evolutionary psychology gets into this subject, bu...Evolutionary psychology gets into this subject, but keep in mind that it is a blind process that takes place on large timescales. It has nothing to do with cognition or self-actualization. It arises because it confers a competitive advantage to the population.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14837238029620913050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-6458007439013185062014-03-19T13:37:13.664-07:002014-03-19T13:37:13.664-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
Once the biological o...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />Once the biological organism has adapted, the needs 'evolve'. & Ours are failing to be fulfilled.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-37278243492478504052014-03-19T13:30:13.905-07:002014-03-19T13:30:13.905-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
Most of us can overlo...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />Most of us can overlook the reasoning of other species such as whales, butterflies or salmon because we don't think like or speak whale, butterfly or salmon, but their migration was incited by survival, a basic need. Elephant herds or any other kind of herd for that matter is due to a safety need. The chimpanzee's growing fond for other species is a demonstration of a love & belonging need (in this case friendships), Lions challenge the alpha male in order to lead the pride as a system based on accomplishment & prestige, which is recognized as a need, so whomever 'achieves' leads. Humans seem to be stuck on the self-actualization needs, reaching the specie's full potential, intellectually. So this is a way to do so: voluntarily developing & expanding our perception. Becoming receptively adaptable. <br />?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-11535109980592946082014-03-19T13:03:49.067-07:002014-03-19T13:03:49.067-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
The only way for us t...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />The only way for us to biologically evolve would be to change our natural environment. But i meant it in the way to develop our reasoning, something that can be reached once a species is successfully adjusted to their habitat, something unlikely to be achieved by endangered species today. They have basic needs to take care of.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-50089557365446772982014-03-19T12:56:30.216-07:002014-03-19T12:56:30.216-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
I don't mean evol...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />I don't mean evolution in the biological sense, but in the conscious/logical sense. A sign that we're an evolved species that is reason.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-86446070241743215302014-03-19T12:53:18.792-07:002014-03-19T12:53:18.792-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
Hey? but how did we b...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />Hey? but how did we become sedentary if not by taught procedure & logic? Now it's normal for us. I know it still doesn't make it an instinct or basic need, but a useful strategy for us to broaden our society to the point it now is unquestionable. I'm pretty sure there are methods to become 'balanced' as i mentioned before, by willingly learning to develop logic, emotion, extraversion, introspection, etc.<br />It can be taught, then habitual.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-13794771497832192302014-03-19T12:43:56.068-07:002014-03-19T12:43:56.068-07:00MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio
:( you have a point. ...MR 17soontobe18 yr old socio<br />:( you have a point. Anyway, it would be optimal if it were contagious or hereditary, which I'm not sure of... Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-628748600098131100.post-51104363843245234622014-03-19T12:13:15.047-07:002014-03-19T12:13:15.047-07:00Pretty unlikely. Evolution has to do with a specie...Pretty unlikely. Evolution has to do with a species, not individuals. So, adjusting the psychological state of an individual would not influence evolution unless it somehow conferred a competitive benefit that was then passed on to offspring and throughout the population. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14837238029620913050noreply@blogger.com