Monday, March 1, 2010

Negative emotions

A reader asks me what sorts of negative emotions I feel: "You've written of loyalty, gratitude, exhilaration (when winning or achieving something), a desire to be in control, etc. I'd like to know more about the other end of the spectrum." My response:
I haven't really thought about this much. One thing that I like about the way my brain works is that it is very easy for me to compartmentalize, so usually I am an optimist, not prone to depression etc. Plus I am very sensitive to pleasure, like I must have too much serotonin or something, but I do sometimes feel down. Some sociopaths are particularly susceptible to depression, or I have a few readers at least who feel debilitating depression.

I was talking with a friend about this and asked what it looks/sounds/feels like when I am allegedly depressed. She said that it just seems like I am frustrated with my inability to think, which I think is accurate. I think when I feel "down," it is usually because my mind has lost some of its functionality, either because I am sick, tired stressed, or the brain is overtaxed. My friend also described her own depression, as a comparator. She said that she puts so much of her identity in how she feels, that when she is feeling poorly, she has a bit of a crisis of identity. I believe that is true for me too. I believe that I put so much of my identity in how I think ("I am how I think") that when my brain is sluggish and not performing up to par, I also have a crisis of identity. Being a sociopath already feels really empty, which I am fine with because i have never experienced anything different (and question whether anything different even exists). So emptiness is something you just have to learn to deal with day to day, like any other chronic illness, but sometimes it flares up or something irritates it, like a sluggish mind. And sometimes it gets really bad, like a crisis of identity, inflamed, and probably the only solution at that point is to (self) medicate it, dull it, quiet the deafening silence of the void, and maybe even that won't help. When it gets really bad, there's a hopelessness in wondering whether I'll ever go back to feeling like myself again, If I never go back to feeling normal, will I still be me? That's a really disturbing concern. I have never, ever have thoughts of suicide, but I do think there are worse things than dying.

31 comments:

  1. eva destructionMar 1, 2010 07:36 AM
    i agree, and i am not sociopath. but i do feel frustrated, almost fragmented when i am depressed. it feels as though someone is constantly pushing my panic button and i cant get away, i cant think clearly and do rash things to fix a small problem, ultimately putting myself in a position in a much bigger problem. always going two steps forward, one step back.
    ReplyDelete
  2. maybe it results from holding on to tightly to a now
    ReplyDelete
  3. or holding on to a now generally
    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sure some of you might have come across this short research article before. It was an interesting read nonetheless:

    http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2003/psychopaths.htm
    ReplyDelete
  5. I think I saw that before but didn't really read it until now. That is very interesting.
    ReplyDelete
  6. It's only just occurred to me, but I think that all my negative feelings are noticed, qualified and elevated by the intensity of boredom I feel in general at that moment or as a result/response to a negative experience. It's probably the x factor that determines gloom, depression or despair. Despair is being depressed and dreadfully bored by it.
    ReplyDelete
  7. Referring to the blog post, what happens following one's return to normal? Is it just time that passes or is there any consistent behavior or thought that precedes coming back into ones perceived best faculties? Is it always just getting drunk/high? What happens when that is done?

    Some believe that a person with S traits got that way through an abusive/traumatic/painful environment (these same some seem to believe that it may be somewhat reversible or maybe more accurately, expandable). If this is so in many cases, might there have been a time, possibly long, long ago, in many cases, when one did feel something in a more "normal" way or at least was ready for it but due to a lacking or cruel environment it (unconditional love?) wasn't given back or the capacity for which wasn't allowed to come online? Might there be echoes of this expressed somewhere?

    A lot of sites describe as one behavior of a person with S a breaking hearts motivation. Could this behavior be revenge for having had their heart broke so long ago? Could the anger that is described as being part of the S psyche be due to not having being loved properly very early on and being possibly forced to adapt a somewhat virtuosic logic deconstructing ability and environmental adaptation ability, allowing one to suss out even the wiftiest of abusive behavior, and to exact revenge on it.

    "so emptiness is something you just have to learn to deal with day to day, like any other chronic illness"

    It sounds to me, and I could be wrong, that the emptiness is something you don't like, as you have to learn to deal with it day by day, though you say you know nothing else.
    ReplyDelete
  8. This "Referring to the blog post, what happens following one's return to normal?", should have read "Referring to the blog post, what happens before one's return to normal?"
    ReplyDelete
  9. Or, perhaps this is a state that is naturally meant to be attained by some humans, and one perspective on its purpose is that it can act as a potent teacher, if one is open to the lesson.
    ReplyDelete
  10. Ishtar, thank you so much for the link
    ReplyDelete
  11. Or, perhaps this is a state that is naturally meant to be attained by some humans, and one perspective on its purpose is that it can act as a potent teacher, if one is open to the lesson.

    for me the feeling of emptiness comes from not buying into any one identity or belief, so there is always this feeling of separateness and a sense of nothingness inside. i imagine someone who completely identifies with the roles in their life (such as career person, partner, parent) would have no sense of themselves existing beyond that and therefore no feeling of emptiness until perhaps their identities are challenged.

    the emptiness is a feeling of existing outside of the normal definitions. because it’s outside of the norm, outside of how we normally perceive reality, the existence is not definable. it feels like nothingness. i perceive it also at times as a feeling of everythingness, infinity.
    ReplyDelete
  12. Zoe, i always get the feeling there is either a giant HOLE, or endless possibilities.
    ReplyDelete
  13. a giant HOLE.. good description of it.
    ReplyDelete
  14. when i’m coming down with a cold i always feel bored, and it’s only when i’m feeling bored and start to panic because i don’t know how to cope because i’m not used to the feeling, that it occurs to me i may be sick. then i can calm down. the panic comes from everything suddenly seeming so meaningless and pointless that i don’t know what to do with myself. there doesn’t seem to be any point in doing anything. yet there is the feeling also that i should be doing something. i end up feeling overwhelmed and mentally paralyzed. when i’m sick i think my thought processes are derailed so much that i can no longer manage my feelings.

    i was five or six the first time i felt that way. i remember sitting outside in the sun, going over in my mind all the things that i could do, and not feeling like playing or doing any of them, and thinking how meaningless and pointless everything was, how boring it all was, and wondering if i would want to ever play with any of my toys again. as it turned out i was coming down with a fever.

    i’m not sure why i feel bored when i’m ill but it may be simply that my mind interprets the body’s signal to slow down at a time of illness as a feeling of boredom.
    ReplyDelete
  15. Some believe that a person with S traits got that way through an abusive/traumatic/painful environment (these same some seem to believe that it may be somewhat reversible or maybe more accurately, expandable). If this is so in many cases, might there have been a time, possibly long, long ago, in many cases, when one did feel something in a more "normal" way or at least was ready for it but due to a lacking or cruel environment it (unconditional love?) wasn't given back or the capacity for which wasn't allowed to come online? Might there be echoes of this expressed somewhere?

    As luck would have it, I was born with psychopathic traits (childhood behaviour and genetic history) and raised in an abusive environment. I still wonder sometimes if I would have become a different "person" if not for the abuse, and whether or not my brand of emotions would have been different from the way they are now.

    For those of us who were not born psychopathic but instead have come from abusive childhoods, I would say that some do in fact recall a wider spectrum of emotions. However, there's a difference between feeling for oneself and feeling for others. The kind of feelings also matter. For instance where someone might feel sorrow or fear, I feel anger and anxiety. This is of course over-simplifying things, since we ought to also consider the degree to which they're felt, though they're virtually immeasurable between varying persons.

    I tend to agree with M.E. in terms of depression. Depression seems to me to be just another version of the "emptiness" associated with sociopaths/psychopaths. The only great difference between the two types is how a normal person versus a sociopath might act in response to it. Where a normal person may react with erratic emotional behaviour, a sociopath will find it a physiological impediment.

    However, I don't often experience any sort of existential crisis because of it, due to my belief that there is no "self" to begin with. Loss of memory, regeneration of cells, environmental changes, etc. all affect one's perceptions of oneself on a daily basis. It seems unreasonable to assume we should adhere to any sort of "identity," unless it's to promote our social welfare.
    ReplyDelete
  16. Maybe when you (as an S person) are not feeling well or are out of sorts or are off balance, or are at low vitality, for whatever reason, you may not have the normal control of your energies or have the energy available or even the motivation to use them as you normally would (to adapt, to shape, to influence) which normally keeps you occupied and maybe provides for some enjoyment. So when you are not able to be the main you, there is non you which feels empty and like a hole, starless.

    Maybe one solution would be to accept this emptiness or at least not be too dismayed by it, with confidence that it is just an ebb and life is ebbs and flows. Maybe there is something valuable or some overlooked knowledge to be gained in that emptiness by not "fighting" it in any way. Maybe not/ymmv.

    Would anyone say that in a way, sociopaths, whatever else one may wish to say about them, have a type of enlightened view? Usually when people talk of attaining "enlightenment" and the cultivating of awareness/living in the present that leads to it, it is often for many people discussed in the context of a long mystical struggle, something that one must work towards and something tricky, something that cannot be bottled or held on to by its very nature. But the person with S, due to having a personality structure that naturally produces a thinking environment that has much less distracting emotional conflict/static/noise in the head, can see and think more clearly and observe causalities and notice things that someone obsessing or busy rationalizing and living in the head and past/future etc is not going to see. Maybe this keen awareness has a blinding side though because, while you may be definitely aware and live it with your masterful ability to adapt through pure logical analysis and keen observation, it may lead to a false conclusion that that is all there is. In reality, for the S person, it may be all there is. I've read many people who are S state that for example that love, and conscience and empathy are delusions or are not real, for anyone. I wonder if that is because of their observation that people often do have a lot of delusions. They fool themselves and fight themselves and as Zoe says, they live as zombies. But maybe these things, love, C and E are real things for some, real core things that often get mixed up with delusions, and maybe the mistake is in thinking that love, c and e are as delusional as the the way they are sometimes used or interacted with.

    If an N person cultivated awareness and lived in the present to a high degree through various work, achieving a quiet head, seeing things moment by moment, and felt and knew in their heart that love, c, and e exist, if this were true, (that this person existed and claimed this) would a person with S think that at a minimum, that this (l,c,e) exists for some people and maybe is not a delusion or at least not as normally considered?
    ReplyDelete
  17. aspie,

    It has always been my belief that "love" is an action, and most people just confuse it with emotions they associated it with. They love things that make them feel positive; they do not "feel" love. People just as readily love things that make them feel pain, so I find it hard to believe it is reactionary. A confusion caused by the complicated layers of emotions.
    ReplyDelete
  18. after an emotionally abusive relationship that was ongoing off and on for six years and another relationship built on mistrust, mis-communication and mind games, i am thoroughly convinced that love is an action. forget about whatever it is you feel, whether lust, or infatuation or even genuine affection, if you don't treat the person in a loving way, you do not love them. simple as that.

    if he tells you one thing, yet his actions say another, he's playing you. i wish more women wouldn't fall for it, but we are suckers every time into the hands of men who just want to use us for sexual flings until they get utterly bored and move on to the next prey.

    giving these men our bodies, and intimacy,yet not even getting a simple commitment out of the ordeal to at least see how far the relationship will grow, what types of bonds are formed or if any at all. i no longer sleep with men who don't want a commitment or marriage in the future. it's a waste of my time.
    ReplyDelete
  19. Women can be this way too you know. It is not soley the domain of men. There is a site where S traited people are looked at as demons and I believe the author is male, and he feels this way due to his experiences with certain women. Some books on abusive people and bullies authored by women have come to the conclusion that women can be the absolute worst bullies and quite "evil" extra cloaked by the fairer sex mother image and all.

    Can't a man truly love you without wanting to make a commitment or want to be married? Perhaps they can make a type of honest commitment, but one you may not like. Maybe that is something you want and won't accept less, but linking that to they don't really love you when really it is just something they don't want and something you want feels devious to me, like conditional love. Men give you their bodies too. Are you better than them?

    If love is an action, then what is the effect on the recipient? Are there different possibilities? If one gets love in return, what does that feel like? Does love have a feeling (gratitude?)
    ReplyDelete
  20. Maybe I am wrong but aren't we always reacting by our very nature? We first perceive then act. We are reacting to our perception.
    ReplyDelete
  21. Perhaps being alive is an act.
    ReplyDelete
  22. Now we are getting into reality vs. perception. Are perceptions of reality colored by emotions or vice versa? I see things in front of me and decide how to respond. Others I have talked to see things based on how they feel. In this resect, the action of "love" could be miscommunicated. The recipients emotions could color their perception of your love (i.e. good or bad, strong or weak, selfish or giving). If they believe you are giving them what they want, then to them you are loving. For me, if they have that percetion, then I have "loved" correctly.
    ReplyDelete
  23. @ aspie, i can't speak for other women, but the man I've chosen to sleep with, i loved them before doing so. i wanted better for them even if we were not going to be together, i wanted nothing but their well being and success, so for me, i gave more than my body. but what is a body without the mind, heart, soul,personality? isn't it all one anyway? you can't have a beating heart outside the human body.

    if I'm giving you my body, I'm giving you everything. like i said, i can't speak for other women nor other "evil" women because that's not who i am. I'm pretty straightforward, i actually compromise a lot but if the guy isn't willing to meet you at least half way but wants the benefits of sexual intimacy, benefits of a good friendship, then you have to move on. you have to seek things and people on your own level. if you lie with dogs you get fleas
    ReplyDelete
  24. Anon @ 8:11, could you explain to me the difference between friendship and a "relationship" if it is not sexual? Do you not consider your friends equal to your parnter? Do you feel more for one person than those others who can be just as giving simply because he is of the preferred sex? The difference between platonic and romantic love is not intensity but attraction.
    ReplyDelete
  25. That sounds beautiful anonymous.

    I think I see what you are saying C.
    ReplyDelete
  26. so what if the relationship is socio vs socio? can it be a real relationship? or is it a game of constant trying to one up eachother? can you ever truely get what you want or need from that person? if both are constantly trying to work the other does it ever stop? can one get bored with the other since they know what they are doing? seems like a dangerous combination that can never win.
    ReplyDelete
  27. Maybe. Sociogirl, your comment reminded me of one of my favorite books and movies, Gone with the Wind. That probably isn't worth much, just an observation.
    ReplyDelete
  28. uh, yeah, that doesn't help at all, lol.
    ReplyDelete
  29. Use it as a model and analyze. Rhett and Scarlett's relationship was based on nothing more than what the other could give them. Interestingly, it has been highly romanticized.
    ReplyDelete
  30. because crazy (and i'm using the term loosely) can seem passionate and when you put passionate with hollywood, you get romance. i suppose in my situation at times can appear passionate or crazy, lol but he says its good like this, i think it is mentally exhausting yet i can see there is no end because as much as him, i cannot stop. so although i am aware that it is toxic, i continue to try and try all different angles to work him as he does with me. we both see through eachother and know what the other is doing. so is there an end in sight? probably not, unless one gets bored with it which i know will not be me because i never give up.
    ReplyDelete
  31. oh and on the depression thing...you control how you feel. i can't say i ever feel empty or depressed. i do however sometimes feel mentally exhausted and will shut myself off from everyone for one night and feel better the next day. its like rebooting. or a new identity, those always help as well.
    ReplyDelete

.

Comments are unmoderated. Blog owner is not responsible for third party content. By leaving comments on the blog, commenters give license to the blog owner to reprint attributed comments in any form.